|
|
|
|
|
Upon completion of this presentation,
participants should be able to: |
|
|
|
Define epidemiology, and describe its relevance
to various agencies and positions |
|
|
|
Understand the importance of both descriptive
and analytic epidemiology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Define an outbreak, and list the ways by which
outbreaks are typically identified |
|
|
|
Define surveillance, and identify types of
surveillance and why they are conducted |
|
|
|
Specify the 10 steps of an outbreak
investigation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Understand roles and responsibilities during an
outbreak investigation |
|
|
|
Demonstrate how to distinguish naturally
occurring outbreaks from bioterrorism |
|
|
|
|
Practice routine surveillance |
|
|
|
Identify potential outbreaks |
|
|
|
Investigate each outbreak in a systematic manner |
|
|
|
Determine if bioterrorism was the cause |
|
|
|
Understand interagency coordination |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“The study of the distribution and determinants
of disease in populations” |
|
|
|
|
The summary of health-related characteristics
according to person, place and time |
|
|
|
Tells you the who, where and when of disease
occurrence |
|
|
|
|
The study of the causal relationships between
exposures and outcomes |
|
|
|
Tells you why disease occurs |
|
|
|
|
Causality is typically achieved by establishing
hypotheses and formally evaluating these hypotheses |
|
|
|
The observed outcome of a subgroup of people
with a particular exposure is compared to the expected outcome of the
population as a whole |
|
|
|
Statistical methods are used to determine if the difference
between the observed outcome and the expected outcome are significantly
different |
|
|
|
If so, there is likely to be a causal
relationship between exposure and the outcome |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptive |
|
|
|
Who, where, when |
|
|
|
Illustrates potential associations |
|
Analytic |
|
|
|
Why |
|
|
|
Evaluates the causality of associations |
|
|
|
|
Practice routine surveillance |
|
|
|
Identify potential outbreaks |
|
|
|
Investigate each outbreak in a systematic manner |
|
|
|
Determine if bioterrorism was the cause |
|
|
|
Understand interagency coordination |
|
|
|
|
What is surveillance? |
|
|
|
Why is surveillance important? |
|
|
|
Types of surveillance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provides an accurate assessment of the status of
health in a given population |
|
|
|
Allows for the detection of an outbreak – the
occurrence of more cases of disease than expected over a defined period of
time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public health surveillance data can be used to: |
|
|
|
guide disease control & prevention measures |
|
|
|
measure the burden of disease |
|
|
|
evaluate public policy |
|
|
|
detect changes in health practices |
|
|
|
prioritize the allocation of health resources |
|
|
|
describe the clinical course of disease |
|
|
|
provide a basis for epidemiologic research |
|
|
|
|
Routine surveillance |
|
|
|
Active surveillance |
|
|
|
Syndromic surveillance |
|
|
|
|
The ongoing systematic collection of data on
specific diseases |
|
|
|
Each state has a list of notifiable diseases:
diseases for which reporting of all suspected cases to public health
authorities is mandated by law |
|
|
|
|
The Maine Bureau of Health requires the report
of Category 1 conditions immediately by telephone, and the report of
Category 2 conditions within 48 hours |
|
|
|
For more information on Maine’s notifiable
conditions, go to: |
|
|
|
|
|
In Maine, the Notifiable Condition Reporting
Form must include: |
|
|
|
Disease or condition |
|
|
|
Demographic information for the case-person |
|
|
|
Diagnostic laboratory findings |
|
|
|
Healthcare provider’s name & contact
information |
|
|
|
|
The directed identification of cases of a
particular disease |
|
|
|
Usually initiated by Bureau of Health |
|
|
|
Most common during an epidemic |
|
|
|
Can also be event-based |
|
|
|
|
The use of data on symptoms that precede
diagnosis to detect an outbreak |
|
|
|
Syndromic surveillance is typically automated |
|
|
|
Ideally, surveillance of symptoms instead of
diagnoses allows for earlier detection |
|
|
|
Most effective when coupled with routine
surveillance |
|
|
|
|
Practice routine surveillance |
|
|
|
Identify potential outbreaks |
|
|
|
Investigate each outbreak in a systematic manner |
|
|
|
Determine if bioterrorism was the cause |
|
|
|
Understand interagency coordination |
|
|
|
|
Review of routinely collected surveillance data |
|
|
|
Astute observation of a sentinel event or
cluster of events by a health care provider |
|
|
|
Members of the community observe unusual trend
in illness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practice routine surveillance |
|
|
|
Identify potential outbreaks |
|
|
|
Investigate each outbreak in a systematic manner |
|
|
|
Determine if bioterrorism was the cause |
|
|
|
Understand interagency coordination |
|
|
|
|
Disease control & prevention |
|
|
|
Public/political/legal concerns |
|
|
|
Program considerations |
|
|
|
Training |
|
|
|
Research |
|
|
|
|
Unexpected event… |
|
|
|
Need to investigate quickly… |
|
|
|
Pressure for answers… |
|
|
|
Multiple agencies involved… |
|
|
|
Under media spotlight… |
|
|
|
Work carried out in the field… |
|
|
|
…requires systematic approach! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
During an outbreak investigation, one typically
hopes to determine the following: |
|
|
|
Characteristics of the outbreak |
|
Who is at risk of disease |
|
What exposures increase risk of disease |
|
|
|
Characteristics of the agent |
|
Source |
|
Mode of transmission |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepare for field work |
|
Establish the existence of an outbreak |
|
Verify the diagnosis |
|
Define & identify cases |
|
Perform descriptive epidemiology |
|
Develop hypotheses |
|
Perform analytic epidemiology |
|
Refine hypotheses & conduct additional
studies |
|
Implement control & prevention measures |
|
Communicate findings |
|
|
|
|
|
Before leaving for the field, one should: |
|
|
|
Research the disease |
|
|
|
Gather equipment & supplies |
|
|
|
Make necessary administrative arrangements |
|
|
|
Determine roles & responsibilities |
|
|
|
|
Before proceeding with the investigation, one
must confirm that the suspected outbreak is a real outbreak |
|
|
|
This is done by comparing the observed number of
cases to the historically expected number of cases |
|
|
|
|
Identify the illness as accurately as possible |
|
|
|
Requires review of clinical findings and
laboratory results |
|
|
|
Also requires talking to case-patients about
their illness |
|
|
|
|
|
The next step is to establish a case definition:
a set of standard criteria for deciding whether a person has a particular
illness |
|
|
|
The case definition should include: |
|
|
|
Clinical information about the disease |
|
|
|
Information regarding person |
|
|
|
Information regarding place |
|
|
|
Information regarding time |
|
|
|
|
The case definition should be specific enough so
that not all people in Maine are identified as cases |
|
|
|
At the same time, the case definition should
also be sensitive enough so that cases are not missed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once the case definition is established, it is
used to identify additional cases |
|
|
|
|
Once data have been collected, the epidemic can
be described in terms of person, place, and time |
|
|
|
An epidemic curve can be drawn to provide
further information about the agent and source |
|
|
|
|
|
Consider what is known about the disease: |
|
|
|
What is the agent’s usual reservoir? |
|
|
|
How is it usually transmitted? |
|
|
|
What are the known risk factors? |
|
|
|
“Round up the usual suspects” |
|
|
|
|
Analyze the available data in order to formally
evaluate the proposed hypotheses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even when your analytic study identifies an
association between exposure and disease, you may need to refine your
hypotheses and conduct additional, more specific studies |
|
|
|
An initial study may implicate a particular
restaurant in a food-borne outbreak, while a second study may narrow the
cause down to a particular menu item |
|
|
|
|
Should be consistent with the outbreak
investigation findings |
|
|
|
Should be implemented as soon as possible to
prevent further infection |
|
|
|
Can range from throwing |
|
away contaminated food |
|
to administering mass |
|
prophylaxis & vaccination |
|
|
|
|
|
Implement control and prevention measures as
early as possible |
|
|
|
Usually target one or more: |
|
Eliminate the source |
|
Interrupt transmission |
|
Reduce susceptibility |
|
|
|
|
Oral briefing for health authorities and people
responsible for implementing control and prevention measures |
|
|
|
This should be |
|
accompanied by |
|
a written scientific |
|
report of the |
|
outbreak investigation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practice routine surveillance |
|
|
|
Identify potential outbreaks |
|
|
|
Investigate each outbreak in a systematic
manner |
|
|
|
Determine if bioterrorism was the cause |
|
|
|
Understand interagency coordination |
|
|
|
|
Single case caused by uncommon agent without
alternative explanation |
|
|
|
Unusual, atypical, genetically engineered or
antiquated strain |
|
|
|
Unusually high morbidity & mortality |
|
|
|
Unusual disease presentation |
|
|
|
|
Unusual geographic or seasonal distribution |
|
|
|
Unexpected increase in endemic disease |
|
|
|
Atypical mode of transmission |
|
|
|
Related to common ventilation system |
|
|
|
Coexisting unusual diseases in individual(s) |
|
|
|
|
Unusual illness affecting large, disparate
populations |
|
|
|
Unusual age group |
|
|
|
Unusual patterns in humans more so than in
animals |
|
|
|
Unusual patterns in animals more so than in
humans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Point source with compressed epidemic curve |
|
|
|
Similar genetic isolates from disparate sources |
|
|
|
Simultaneous clusters in disparate areas |
|
|
|
Large numbers of unexplained deaths |
|
|
|
|
Practice routine surveillance |
|
|
|
Identify potential outbreaks |
|
|
|
Investigate each outbreak in a systematic
manner |
|
|
|
Determine if bioterrorism was the cause |
|
|
|
Understand interagency coordination |
|
|
|
|
During a naturally occurring outbreak, this is
the typical structure: |
|
|
|
|
During a suspected bioterrorism event: |
|
|
|
|
Practice routine surveillance |
|
|
|
Identify potential outbreaks |
|
|
|
Investigate each outbreak in a systematic
manner |
|
|
|
Determine if bioterrorism was the cause |
|
|
|
Understand interagency coordination |
|